Categories
Auto-Posted - Sites from Michael_Novakhov

FBI Reform: Eurasia Review: The Case For Impeachment Goes Far Beyond Ukraine – OpEd


Listen to this article

“Has Trump finally gone too far?” There’s a headline you’ve seen a thousand times.

At last, Speaker Nancy Pelosi says he has. A whistleblower says Trump
withheld foreign aid to Ukraine to pressure the country’s new president
into investigating Joe Biden’s son Hunter’s past business there. Trump
doesn’t even really deny it.

Pelosi has long resisted calls for impeachment, to the chagrin of
more progressive lawmakers and activists. But the latest revelations
finally brought a cavalcade of more centrist party figures around on the
issue.

If true, of course, Trump’s conduct was patently corrupt. “If the
president used his office to get a foreign government to investigate a
political rival, with an eye toward undermining that rival, that’s a
clear abuse of power that assaults the basic premises of American
democracy,” explains The Nation’s John Nichols.

But I admit I’m puzzled — not about why Trump’s behavior here was bad, but why this was the offense that got so many reluctant Democrats to stick their neck out.

There’s been any number of earlier abuses — from the merely venal
(like altering a hurricane forecast with a sharpie) to the
unapologetically corrupt (like putting military officers in Trump hotels
and charging taxpayers for vacations at his own properties).

I also recall there was something about Russia, a fired FBI director,
and — oh right — that time he called Nazis who’d just beaten people and
killed someone in Charlottesville “very fine people.”

At every juncture, and countless others, pundits wondered whether
this was the last straw, only to have a fresh truckload delivered the
next day. (In fact, the Trump campaign now makes a killing selling Trump-branded plastic straws, to trigger the sea turtles I guess.)

To me the Ukraine-Biden gambit looks like a lot of other things Trump
has accustomed us to expect from him. Is there some deep reservoir of
public affection for Biden or Ukraine that Democrats feel they can draw
on to get their case across this time? It seems unlikely.

The fact that we’ve grown desensitized to such abuses could itself be
the best reason to finally prosecute one. But truthfully, there are
about a thousand other things I’d rather see lawmakers build a case
around.

For instance, after taking buckets of fossil fuel money, the president rolled back power plant emissions limits, launched legal action against automakers who agreed to increase their fuel efficiency, and wants us out of the Paris climate agreement. He’s repeatedly censored government climate scientists to cover his tracks.

Is destroying the planet impeachable?

What about caging thousands of children, or continuing to separate them from their parents after a court ordered him to stop? Or openly violating U.S. and international law on the treatment of refugees? Or allegedly encouraging border officials to break the law, with the promise of pardons?

Speaking of attacking rivals, what about tweeting incendiary racist
slanders against Reps. Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and other progressive
women of color, all but openly encouraging extremist violence against them?

What about encouraging a foreign leader,
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to block those members of
Congress from an official visit to the top U.S. aid recipient?

Impeachment is as much a political tool as a legal one. If Democrats
feel they need the Ukraine story as a legal hook to start the process,
that’s one thing — but I hope they won’t forget to make a political case
against these much more egregious abuses along the way.

Otherwise they risk sending the message that the worst thing a
president can do isn’t to attack the people or the planet, but a fellow
elite.

Eurasia Review

FBI Reform